USPTO serial 75982984
UNBREAKABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNBREAKABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Fields
SCOTT J FIELDS NATIONAL IP RIGHTS CENTER LLC550 TOWNSHIP LINE RD STE 400BLUE BELL, PA 19422UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | security devices, namely, metal anti-theft locks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |