USPTO serial 75982997
KANNAPOLIS INTIMIDATORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2007
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with KANNAPOLIS INTIMIDATORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $2,144*
Plus Government fees of $3,900
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mooresville, NC, US
Mooresville, NC, US
Mooresville, NC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George M Taulbee
George M Taulbee ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 South Tryon Street, Suite 4000CHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | jewelry, namely, lapel pins | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2001 |
| 016 | trading cards; stickers; decals; pens [ and pencils ] | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2001 |
| 020 | [ seat cushions ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 2001 |
| 021 | beverage holders [ ; figurines made of porcelain ] | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2001 |
| 024 | pennants | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2001 |
| 028 | sports balls, namely, baseballs, [ bats; ] miniature bats [ ; replica batting helmets ] | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2001 |
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of baseball games and baseball related exhibitions | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Earnhardt, Teresa H.
- Other trademarks owned by Earnhardt, Teresa H.
- Other trademarks owned by Earnhardt, Teresa H.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named KANNAPOLIS INTIMIDATORS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |