USPTO serial 75983038
SE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2796484Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 2003
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Matsudo-shi, Chiba-ken, JP
Matsudo-shi, Chiba-ken, JP
Matsudo-shi, Chiba-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | LIQUID SOAPS FOR HANDS, FACE AND BODY; ABRASIVE PAPER, ABRASIVE CLOTH, SAND FOR USE AS ABRASIVE IN SANDBLASTING, ALL PURPOSE CLEANING AND POLISHING PREPARATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 1992 |
| 007 | CHEMICAL PROCESSING MACHINES AND APPARATUS, NAMELY, AGITATING MACHINES FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING, DRYING MACHINES FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING, CHEMICAL FIBER DRYING MACHINES, ADSORBING MACHINES FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING, MIXING AND BLENDING MACHINES FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING, DUST COLLECTING MACHINES FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING, CLEANING APPARATUS FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING, SORTING MACHINES FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING, FILTERING MACHINES FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING, AND HEATER FOR STIFFENING ADHESIVE; PLASTIC PROCESSING MACHINES, NAMELY, COMPRESSION MOLDING MACHINES, EXTRUSION MOLDING MACHINES, INJECTION MOLDING MACHINES, AND PLASTIC MOULDS; POLISHING MACHINE FOR OPTICAL FIBERS AND SYSTEMS, NAMELY, OPTICAL FIBER END FACE POLISHING APPARATUS; SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING MACHINES AND SYSTEMS NAMELY, GRINDING APPARATUS, POLISHING APPARATUS, AND ABRASIVE APPARATUS; SHAFTS, AXLES OR SPINDLES NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES, BEARINGS NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES, SHAFT COUPLINGS NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES; SHOCK ABSORBERS NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES, SPRINGS NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES; BRAKES NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES; VALVES NOT FOR LAND VEHICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 1992 |
| 009 | OPTICAL FIBERS AND CABLES; OPTICAL FIBER COMPONENTS, NAMELY, OPTICAL FIBER FERRULE, OPTICAL FIBER CONNECTOR, OPTICAL FIBER ADAPTOR, OPTICAL FIBER WAVELENGTH FILTER, OPTICAL FIBER ATTENUATOR, OPTICAL FIBER WDM (WAVELENGTH DIVISION MULTIPLEXER/DEMULTIPLEXER), OPTICAL FIBER TERMINATOR; OPTICAL FIBERS MEASURING OR TESTING MACHINES AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, OPTICAL FIBER ATTENUATION MEASURING APPARATUS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 1992 |
| 012 | AUTOMOBILES AND AUTOMOBILE PARTS, NAMELY, SHAFTS, AXLES OR SPINDLES FOR LAND VEHICLES, BEARINGS FOR LAND VEHICLES, SHAFT COUPLINGS OR CONNECTORS FOR LAND VEHICLES, POWER TRANSMISSIONS AND GEARING FOR LAND VEHICLES, SHOCK ABSORBERS FOR LAND VEHICLES, SPRINGS FOR LAND VEHICLES, BRAKES FOR LAND VEHICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seikoh Giken Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Seikoh Giken Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Seikoh Giken Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |