Drawing for BATTLE FIELD EARTH

USPTO serial 75983040

BATTLE FIELD EARTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOKOLS, GWEN P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BATTLE FIELD EARTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas M Small

THOMAS M SMALL SMALL LARKIN10940 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 18LOS ANGELES, CA 90024-3915UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021DRINKING MUGSACTIVEMar 12, 2001
028TOYS, NAMELY, ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES, AND MECHANICAL TOYSACTIVEMay 1, 2000
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, MOTION PICTURE FILM PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTIONACTIVEMay 12, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 8, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 16, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2003ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
May 9, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 8, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 10, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance