USPTO serial 75983043
BACHOSAURUS REX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BACHOSAURUS REX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce J. Goldner
BRUCE J GOLDNER SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLPFOUR TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING MUSICAL CONCERTS, ORCHESTRAL CONCERTS, DANCE PERFORMANCES, AND COMPETITIONS AND AWARD CEREMONIES IN THE FIELD OF MUSIC; PROVIDING INSTRUCTION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MUSIC | ACTIVE | Oct 9, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |