USPTO serial 75983061
MONDI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2724799Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2003
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MONDI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
81735 Munchen, DE
81735 Munchen, DE
85609 Aschheim-Dornach, DE
85609 Aschheim-Dornach, DE
KOWLOON, HK
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | woven, warp-knitted and knitted wearing apparel for ladies, gentlemen and children, namely, jackets, blouses, pants, skirts, coats, sweaters, cardigans, T-shirts, as well as accessories, namely, [ hats ] and other headwear, scarves, shoes, [ boots, slippers,] sandals, belts [, socks, stockings and gloves ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 12, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mondi Textile GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mondi Textile GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Chamaa, Fehmi
- Other trademarks owned by Chamaa, Fehmi
- Other trademarks owned by MAXIFIRM HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MONDI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 7, 2010 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 26, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |