USPTO serial 75983107
I WANT TO BELIEVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2945337Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2005
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with I WANT TO BELIEVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | posters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named I WANT TO BELIEVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 4, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |