USPTO serial 75983122
MUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Central Hong Kong, HK
Redwood City, CA
Central Hong Kong, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW V SMITH
ANDREW V SMITH SIERRA PATENT GROUP, LTDPO BOX 6149STATELINE, NV 89449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Integrated communications and video products, namely, browser software, 3D graphic imaging software, software platforms, distributed file sharing software, HTML browser software, instant messaging software, input devices, namely, mouses, joysticks, gloves, and goggles, set top boxes and video game machines for use with television, peripherals cards, namely 3D graphics cards and cable modem cards, and computers, comprising hardware and software platforms, operating systems and communications interfaces for processing voice, video and data signals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Muse Communications Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by POD Development, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Muse Communications Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Muse Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MUSE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |