Drawing for LARK

USPTO serial 75983167

LARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2711720Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 29, 2003
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LYNNE E GRAYBEAL

Grace Han Stanton Perkins Coie, LLP1201 Third Avenue, 40th FloorSeattle, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded videotapes, laser discs, compact discs, DVDs featuring audiovisual programs, motion picture films, and entertainment and educational programsSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2008C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Sep 4, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 27, 2008CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
May 22, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 28, 2008PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 29, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 6, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 7, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 7, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 22, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 13, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 22, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 23, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 23, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 18, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 23, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 29, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 2, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 5, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 1, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance