Drawing for AQUA CARPATICA DORNA

USPTO serial 75983211

AQUA CARPATICA DORNA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUA CARPATICA DORNA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS AND SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICESACTIVEJan 31, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 18, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 25, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2002EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 15, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 31, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 25, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2000IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Nov 10, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 24, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 18, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance