USPTO serial 75983232
LIBERTY OF LONDON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIBERTY OF LONDON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald N. Huff
DONALD N HUFF DYKEMA GOSSETTSTE 300 W1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Essential oils for personal use; cosmetics, namely, soaps, lipstick, foundation make-up, powder compacts, hair lotions; perfumed sachets, namely, lavender scented bags and herb scented bags; perfumes; potpourris; body moisturizing lotions; sachets for perfuming linen; toiletries, namely, toothpaste, hair shampoos, and toilet water | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Sunglass cases and eyewear cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Jams; crystallized fruits-- jellies; fruit jellies | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Biscuits; tea-- chocolate; confectionery; honey | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |