USPTO serial 75983252
HITACHI VIA MECHANICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3072362Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2006
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HITACHI VIA MECHANICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
David Ehrlich Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | drilling machines and parts therefor; drilling machine for printed circuit boards; power tools namely routers for printed circuit boards; metal working machine, namely, electric discharge machine for precision die production and parts machining; power operated high speed grinding wheel; milling machines; metal working machines, namely, machining centers; transfer machines for motor frames; printing presses and printing machines, namely, rotary gravure and letter rotary presses; electric welding machines; electric die cutting machines; electric soldering machines; laser drilling machine not for medical use; laser drilling machine for printed circuit boards | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Apr 2, 1999 |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of drilling machines, power tools, metal working machines, power operated high speed grinding wheels, milling machines, metal working machines, transfer machines for motor frames, printing presses and printing machines, electric welding machines, electric die cutting machines, electric soldering machines, laser drilling machines, laser direct imaging machines for use in imaging the innerlayers and flex panels of printed circuit boards and digitizers in the nature of electronic digital writing and drawing pads | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | May 20, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named HITACHI VIA MECHANICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2014 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |