USPTO serial 75983353
RXDDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2840560Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2004
- Examiner
- MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RXDDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Strongsville, OH
Strongsville, OH
NORTH ROYALTON, OH
NORTH ROYALTON, OH
North Royalton, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WARREN M HAINES II
WARREN M HAINES II CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP800 SUPERIOR AVE STE 1400CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing an on-line computer database in the field of health care | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Papandreas, Samuel G.
- Other trademarks owned by Papandreas, Samuel G.
- Other trademarks owned by RXDDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RXDDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RxDDS, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RXDDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 11, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |