USPTO serial 75983357
BUDGIE THE LITTLE HELICOPTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2832306Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2004
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BUDGIE THE LITTLE HELICOPTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sleepy Kid Company Limited, The
Edgware, Middlesex HA8 7EB, GB
Sleepy Kid Company Limited, The
Edgware, Middlesex HA8 7EB, GB
Sleepy Kid Company Limited, The
Edgware, Middlesex HA8 7EB, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sonja Keith
Sonja Keith Classic Media, Inc85 Fifth Avenue, 6th FLNew York, NY 10003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | household utensils and containers, namely, table plates, cups, saucers, drinking glasses, egg cups, mugs; cookware, namely, pots; glass, namely, beverageware, bakeware; electric and non-electric toothbrushes; household sponges; hair brushes and combs; cake molds; candy dishes; hot water bottles; napkin holders; vacuum flasks; soft and hard sided lunch boxes; and pop up straw canteens | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1994 |
| 025 | men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, T-shirts; night dresses; pajamas; shorts; footwear; sweatshirts; underwear; lingerie; scarves; hats; caps; belts for wear; aprons; swimwear; socks; ski boots; gloves; dungarees; track suits; dressing gowns; wrist bands and sweat bands; waterproof jackets; rain slickers; waterproof boots; waterproof shoes; waterproof hats; Halloween costumes and accessories, namely, masks and masks sold in connection with Halloween costumes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1994 |
| 028 | toys and games, namely, skateboards; roller skates; model vehicles and related accessories sold as a unit; balloons; party favors in the nature of small toys; finger puppets; bubble blowers; model figures; board games; hand held electronic games; video and computer game cartridges and tapes; video game cartridges; and plush toys | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sleepy Kid Company Limited, The
- Other trademarks owned by Sleepy Kid Company Limited, The
- Other trademarks owned by Sleepy Kid Company Limited, The
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BUDGIE THE LITTLE HELICOPTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 26, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |