Drawing for DAIMLERCHRYSLER

USPTO serial 75983362

DAIMLERCHRYSLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2784572Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 18, 2003
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAIMLERCHRYSLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012MOTOR VEHICLES, NAMELY AUTOMOBILES AND TRUCKS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFORSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJan 5, 2003
036FINANCIAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING LOAN FINANCING AND INSURANCE CONSULTATION FOR MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIPSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJan 5, 2003
037MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SERVICESSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJan 5, 2003
039LEASING OF MOTOR VEHICLESSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJan 5, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 19, 2008C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 18, 2008C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Apr 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 23, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 18, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 9, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 9, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 2, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 31, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 9, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance