USPTO serial 75983362
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
70546 Stuttgart, DE
70546 Stuttgart, DE
70546 Stuttgart, DE
50667 Koln, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | MOTOR VEHICLES, NAMELY AUTOMOBILES AND TRUCKS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2003 |
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING LOAN FINANCING AND INSURANCE CONSULTATION FOR MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIPS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2003 |
| 037 | MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2003 |
| 039 | LEASING OF MOTOR VEHICLES | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |