Drawing for SMART

USPTO serial 75983379

SMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

V. T. GIORDANO

V. T. GIORDANO von Maltitz, Derenberg, Kunin, Janssen & Giordano60 East 42nd StreetNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Referrals in the field of auto care services, namely, arranging for auto care services, automobile leasing, automobile parking and automobile transportation; invoicing services in the field of automobiles to replace leased of rental automobilesACTIVE—
036Insurance services, namely, underwriting extended warranty contracts in the field of automobiles; administration in the field of automobile insuranceACTIVE—
037Auto care services, particularly, cleaning, maintenance, repair, and the replacement of auto parts and accessoriesACTIVE—
039Leasing of automobiles; automobile parking; transportation of persons by automobiles, and goods and automobiles by trucks; travel agency services, namely, arranging for reservations and bookings for transportationACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting class and road instruction in the field of automobiles and automobile safetyACTIVE—
042Technical consultation and research relating to automobiles; travel agency services, namely arranging for reservations and bookings for temporary lodgingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 18, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 23, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 15, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 26, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 18, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 6, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance