Drawing for EXPRESS TECHNOLOGIES "WE ENERGIZE TRANSITION"

USPTO serial 75983392

EXPRESS TECHNOLOGIES "WE ENERGIZE TRANSITION"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPRESS TECHNOLOGIES "WE ENERGIZE TRANSITION"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah Anne Keefe

SARAH ANNE KEEFE WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLCSTE 3500 ONE ATLANTIC CTR1201 W PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use as a database repository to facilitate the online exchange of a collection of templates in the fields of insurance, financial services, utilities industries, telecommunications, government, and general manufacturing and distribution industries and software development tools to aid in tracking and reporting on identification of business strategy development, operational and organizational design, business requirements development for information systems support, business and information systems modeling, information systems design and constructionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 27, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 6, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 11, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 6, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 6, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance