USPTO serial 75983397
HELEN STEINER RICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2004
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HELEN STEINER RICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CINCINNATI, OH
HELEN STEINER RICE FOUNDATION FUND, LLC
CINCINNATI, OH
Other trademarks owned by HELEN STEINER RICE FOUNDATION FUND, LLC
Cincinnati, OH
Cincinnati, OH
Cincinnati, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily M. Judge
Emily M. Judge Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 E. 5th Street1900 Chemed CenterCincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Figurines of ceramic, decorative/commemorative plates | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER
- Other trademarks owned by HELEN STEINER RICE FOUNDATION FUND, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Helen Steiner Rice Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by Helen Steiner Rice Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by Helen Steiner Rice Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named HELEN STEINER RICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |