Drawing for HELEN STEINER RICE

USPTO serial 75983397

HELEN STEINER RICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2839372Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 11, 2004
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with HELEN STEINER RICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Emily M. Judge

Emily M. Judge Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 E. 5th Street1900 Chemed CenterCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Figurines of ceramic, decorative/commemorative platesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 30, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 31, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 26, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 16, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 16, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 16, 2008CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Dec 6, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 30, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Sep 30, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 22, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 20011.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Jan 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance