USPTO serial 75983405
SHO-BOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SHO-BOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID TOREN
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | (Based on 44(e) Foreign registration number 1702202) Metal expansion joints for bridges | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | (Based on 44(e) Foreign registration number 1452889 ) Non-metal expansion joint for bridges | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | (Based on 44(e) Foreign registration number 3006225 ) Erection of steel structures, general building construction, housing painting and road paving | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | (Based on 44(e) Foreign registration number 2472347) Interior decorating and civil engineering services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHO-BOND CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SHO-BOND CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SHO-BOND CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SHO-BOND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |