USPTO serial 75983407
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Harvey
GORDON K WRIGHT COOPER & SCULLY, PC900 JACKSON ST STE 100DALLAS, TX 75202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After-shave lotions; shaving balms; non-medicated lip balms; bath gels; eye creams; hand creams; shaving creams; facial scrubs; bath gels; shaving gels; shower gels; hair shampoos; facial lotions; skin moisturizers; nail care preparations; perfumes; shaving lotions; skin cleansing lotions; skin emollients; liquid soaps for hands, face and body; sun block preparations; sun screen preparations; and wrinkle removing skin care preparations | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |