USPTO serial 75983421
Serial No. 75983421
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3143650Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2006
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 75983421?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2371 GV Roelofarendsveen, NL
2371 GV Roelofarendsveen, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAYMOND I. GERALDSON, JR.
Belinda J. Scrimenti PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD200 S WACKER DR STE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal key rings not of precious metals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Letter scales; computer mice and mouse pads; radio alarm clocks; calculators; and radios | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Watches; key rings of precious metals; alarm clocks; alarm clocks incorporating radios | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |