USPTO serial 75983435
TINDALLCAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2834782Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 20, 2004
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TINDALLCAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M MOOSE
RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P. O. BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Precast and prestressed concrete pieces for building, namely, underground vaults and cabeling conduits, protective vaults, towers, jail and prison cell modules; and concrete drainage structures, namely, inlets, trench drains, junction boxes and storm manholes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacturing, for others, of precast and prestressed concrete pieces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the manufacture and use of precast and prestressed concrete pieces for building and design, for others, of precast and prestressed concrete pieces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TINDALL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TINDALL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TINDALL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TINDALLCAST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 3, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 3, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 16, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |