USPTO serial 75983466
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Woodland Hills, CA
Woodland Hills, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman Zafman
LO-MAE LAI CHUECOS AMERICAN MEDIA INC1000 AMERICAN MEDIA WAYBOCA RATON, FL 33464-1000UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | on-going magazine article columns in the field of fitness | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |