USPTO serial 75983521
NETPOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NETPOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely brochures and manuals regarding postal services, the preparation of mail pieces, direct marketing, electronic postal services, electronically transmitting, processing and receiving documents and correspondence for electronic delivery, electronically transmitting and receiving documents for printing on paper and delivery in hard-copy form, transmitting secure messages, transmitting money, and encryption services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Bill payment services; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; electronic transfers of money; electronic credit transactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by United States Postal Service
- Other trademarks owned by United States Postal Service
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named NETPOST
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |