USPTO serial 75983527
M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2944156Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2005
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina A. Carvalho
Cristina A. Carvalho Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWTM DocketWashington, DC 20036-5339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | DRINK WARE, NAMELY, MUGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 24, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |