USPTO serial 75983528
LANCE ARMSTRONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2005
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LANCE ARMSTRONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAN CHAPMAN
DAN CHAPMAN JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.112 EAST PECAN STREETSUITE 2400SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | energy bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |