USPTO serial 75983530
MEXICO DIRECTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEXICO DIRECTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TELEFONOS DE MEXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V.
MEXICO CITY, MX
Other trademarks owned by TELEFONOS DE MEXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V.
Telefonos De Mexico, S.A. De C.V.
C.P. 06599, Mexico City, MX
Telefonos De Mexico, S.A. De C.V.
C.P. 06599, Mexico City, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
Lawrence E. Abelman ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telephones, cellular telephones, and telephone apparatus, namely, intercoms, telephone receivers, telephone transmitters, telephone wire, elbow rests for use with telephones, blank audio discs, blank video discs, blank optical discs, prepaid telephone calling cards, magnetically encoded; computers, data processors, and coin-operated vending machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Cellular telephone services, telephone communication, electronic transmission, of data and documents via computer terminals, electronic mail services, electronic store and forward messaging, electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone paging services, rental of telephones and facsimile machines, audio and video teleconferencing, voicemail services, voice activated dialing services and telesthetic services, long distance telephone services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELEFONOS DE MEXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Telefonos De Mexico, S.A. De C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Telefonos De Mexico, S.A. De C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named MEXICO DIRECTO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |