USPTO serial 75983576
DISCOVERY KIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DISCOVERY KIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony V. Lupo
Anthony V. Lupo ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Guides featuring information on television programming, stationery, namely, writing paper, notecards, post cards, diaries, pens, pencils, pencil cases, paper stationery-type portfolios, binders, notebooks; books featuring information on children's television programming; calendars; photographs; collector's trading cards, decals, stickers; paper party supplies, namely, napkins, tablecloths, table decorations | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bedding, namely, sheets, pillowcases, pillow shams, dust ruffles, comforters, duvet covers, blankets; towels; curtains; shower curtains; textile wall hangings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named DISCOVERY KIDS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |