USPTO serial 75983577
VIRGIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRGIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London W8 7AR, GB
London W8 7AR, England, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hayley Werner
CARRIE B KINGSLEY FRIED FRANK HARRIS SHRIVER & JACOBSON LLONE NEW YORK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMES; EAU DE-COLOGNE; TOILET WATERS; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; SHAVING PREPARATIONS; AFTER-SHAVE LOTIONS; SHAVING FOAMS; NON-MEDICATED TOILET PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, CONDITIONERS; NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS AND BATH OILS; DEPILATORIES; DENTIFRICES; MOUTHWASHES; COSMETICS, NAMELY, FACE POWDERS, BLUSHER, LIPSTICKS, LIP GLOSS, AND EYE MAKE-UP; SUNTANNING AND SUNSCREENING PREPARATIONS; NON-MEDICATED PREPARATIONS FOR THE CARE OF THE SKIN NAMELY, TONERS, EXFOLIATORS, SCRUBS, NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, AND SHAVING PREPARATIONS;HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY CONDITIONERS, LOTIONS, STYLING GELS, MOUSSE, OILS, SPRAYS, HAIR COLORING AND DECOLORANT PREPARATIONS; DYES FOR THE HAIR AND PERMANENT WAVING AND CURLING PREPARATIONS;NON-MEDICATED SKIN CLEANSING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, GELS, EXFOLIATORS, SCRUBS, AND TONERS; BABY POWDER; TALCUM POWDERS; NAIL VARNISHES AND NAIL VARNISH REMOVERS; NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS; ARTIFICIAL NAILS AND ADHESIVES THEREFOR; GLUES, ADHESIVES, ACRYLIC, SILK AND LINEN WRAPS FOR THE REPAIR OF ARTIFICIAL NAILS; ARTIFICIAL EYELASHES AND ADHESIVES THEREFOR | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |