Drawing for ZOIDS

USPTO serial 75983616

ZOIDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZOIDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James D. Halsey, Jr.

WILLIAM F HERBERT STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER SOLD IN BULKACTIVE—
020NON-METAL KEY CHAINSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 23, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 23, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 9, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 4, 2007NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE—
Oct 4, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 11, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2007ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Jun 4, 2007CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
May 9, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 7, 2007RCIIREQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 28, 2007FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Dec 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 15, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 24, 2006PBMRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Jun 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2006FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2006ISICWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - INCOMING CORR RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Sep 14, 2005CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Jun 15, 2005PRMPPOST REG MISC. PAPER—
Jun 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2005PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Nov 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2004AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Apr 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 10, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Dec 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance