USPTO serial 75983635
HANDPICKED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2003
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with HANDPICKED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BAYVIEW, NWS 2104, AU
BAYVIEW, NWS 2104, AU
HANDPICKED WINES INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD
Sydney, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by HANDPICKED WINES INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD
BAYVIEW, NWS 2104, AU
Surry Hills NSW 2010, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence H. Binderow
Lawrence H. Binderow BINDEROW LAW OFFICES1330 Camino Del MarSuite 250Del Mar, CA 92014-2508Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | [ ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, WHISKEY, HARD CIDER, RUM, VODKA, GIN, BOURBON, BRANDY, PEPPERMINT LIQUOR;] WINE [ AND CHAMPAGNE; DISTILLED SPIRITS MADE FROM RICE; EXTRACTS OF SPIRITUOUS LIQUORS; DISTILLED SPIRITS; FRUIT WINES; ALCOHOLIC FRUIT EXTRACTS; FRUIT ALCOHOLS, NAMELY, STRAWBERRY, PEACH AND BERRY SCHNAPPS, KIRSCH ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AM ADVERTISING DESIGN PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by AM ADVERTISING DESIGN PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by HANDPICKED WINES INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by AM ADVERTISING DESIGN PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Mills, Andrew
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named HANDPICKED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 9, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 9, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 23, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 23, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 16, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 14, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |