USPTO serial 75983655
DISCOVERY KIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2009
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DISCOVERY KIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Discovery Communications, Inc.
Bethesda, MD
New York, NY
Discovery Communications, Inc.
Bethesda, MD
SILVER SPRING, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Modzeleski
David S. Modzeleski Warner Bros. Discovery Legal Department230 Park Avenue SouthNew York, NY 10003United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video game discs | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DISCOVERY KIDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 15, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 15, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 14, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |