USPTO serial 75983682
BG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3814849Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 6, 2010
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BG INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED
READING BERKSIRE, GB
Reading, Berkshire, RG6 1PT, GB
BG INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED
READING BERKSIRE, GB
BG INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED
READING BERKSIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L Baker
Stephen L Baker BAKER AND RANNELLS PA92 E. Main Street., Suite 302Somerville, NJ 08876UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation, repair, emergency servicing and maintenance of pipework; laying, repair, maintenance, replacement, refurbishment and inspection of pipelines; construction, repair and maintenance of gas installations, services relating to the installation, repair and maintenance of energy-using appliances and to the construction, repair and maintenance of energy-using installations; installation of insulating materials; drilling of wells, extraction of oil and gas, oil and gas drilling, oil and gas pumping and extraction; underwater construction; demolition of houses and buildings; building construction services; land development services; construction, maintenance and renovation of property; dismantling and removing unused oil platforms and drilling rigs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Storage, distribution, transportation, shipping, delivery and metering of gas, liquefied natural gas, gaseous fuels and oils; transmission and/or distribution and/or supply of electricity; electric utility generating services, leasing of property, namely, tankers and other ships, vessels and watercrafts, hovercraft, motor vehicles, aircraft, airships, railway locomotives, wagons, and trucks; maintaining a database pertaining to aspects of an international energy production and distribution company, namely, fuel storage, distribution, transmission and supply | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Testing of the efficiency of operation of appliances and the safety checking of appliances and pipework; scientific, engineering and environmental research and development services; geophysical and geological surveys services; exploration and production of gas and oil; underwater exploration; land surveying services; computer services, namely, maintaining a database pertaining to aspects of an international energy production and distribution company, namely, geophysical exploration of fuel sources; designing computer software for others, computer programming services for others; testing of gas appliances, pipework, apparatus, and instruments utilizing gas, inspection of pipelines; testing of gas appliances, pipework, apparatus and instruments utilizing gas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BG INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BG plc
- Other trademarks owned by BG INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BG INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2019 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |