USPTO serial 75983726
ANNE OF THE ISLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 12, 2013
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ANNE OF THE ISLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey D. Sanok
Jeffrey D. Sanok Crowell & Moring LLPP.O. Box 14300Washington, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and interactive multimedia computer game programs combining one or more of sound, pictures, text and video imagery into an interactive or linear presentation on CD ROM or computer diskette featuring stories, games and clip art | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry bracelets; necklaces; wall clocks; watches; pocket watches; stop watches; wrist watches; watches containing an electronic game function | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper and paper articles, namely, trading cards, postcards; writing and note paper and pads; pens and pencils; stickers; appointment books, bookmarks, date books, series of exercise books and picture books, notebooks, memorandum books, telephone number books; series of pocket-sized fiction books; fan club newsletters; newsletters and bulletins all relating to cartoon motion pictures | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Beach bags, leather key fobs, key cases, tote bags; back packs; umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Housewares, namely, mugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing for men, women and children, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts; headwear, namely, hats; footwear, namely, shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, games, and playthings, namely, action figures and accessories therefor, dolls, soft sculpture dolls, doll clothing, board games and game equipment sold as a unit for playing board games, jigsaw puzzles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sullivan Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sullivan Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sullivan Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ANNE OF THE ISLAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 19, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 19, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2012 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |