USPTO serial 75983730
THE FAUCET DOCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 1988
- Examiner
- SKORO, LINDA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with THE FAUCET DOCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRADDOCK HILLS, PA
HARRISON CITY, PA
HARRISON CITY, PA
HARRISON CITY, PA
BRADDOCK HILLS, PA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SPECIALTY FAUCETS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KEOUGH, ELISABETH
- Other trademarks owned by STURM, LAWRENCE ROY
- Other trademarks owned by STURM, LAWRENCE ROY
- Other trademarks owned by STURM, LAWRENCE ROY
- Other trademarks owned by KEOUGH, CLIFFORD
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE FAUCET DOCTOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 27, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 30, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ERTR | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 18, 2007 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 17, 1994 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 5, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 21, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |