USPTO serial 76000042
TROY CORSER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TROY CORSER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montecarlo, MC
Montecarlo, MC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Holman
JOHN C HOLMAN JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN, PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, COATS, MANTLES, RAINCOATS, DRESSES, SUITS, SKIRTS, JACKETS, TROUSERS, JEANS, WAISTCOATS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, BLOUSES, JERSEYS, SWEATERS, BLAZERS, CARDIGANS, STOCKINGS, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, CORSETS, NIGHT-GOWNS, PAJAMAS, BATHROBES, BATHING SUITS, SUN SUITS, SPORT JACKETS, WIND-RESISTANT JACKETS, ANORAKS, SWEATSUITS, TIES, NECKTIES, SCARVES, SHAWLS, FOULARDS, CAPS, HATS, GLOVES, SASHES, BELTS; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, BOOTS, SHOES AND SLIPPERS | ACTIVE | Nov 24, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |