USPTO serial 76000057
VERGINELLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 2004
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VERGINELLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AZIENDA AGRICOLA GERLANDO TAIBI
Agrigento, IT
AZIENDA AGRICOLA GERLANDO TAIBI
Agrigento, IT
AZIENDA AGRICOLA GERLANDO TAIBI
Agrigento, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank P. Presta
FRANK P PRESTA NIXON & VANDERHYE11TH FL901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | EDIBLE OILS AND FATS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 3, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AZIENDA AGRICOLA GERLANDO TAIBI
- Other trademarks owned by AZIENDA AGRICOLA GERLANDO TAIBI
- Other trademarks owned by AZIENDA AGRICOLA GERLANDO TAIBI
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named VERGINELLO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |