USPTO serial 76000066
USED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with USED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD A FLYNT
RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN LLP1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | EDUCATION LOAN SERVICES; BROKERING EDUCATION LOANS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by U. S. Education Finance Management Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by U. S. Education Finance Management Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named USED
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |