USPTO serial 76000076
AEROSPACE NORTH AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AEROSPACE NORTH AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AEROSPACE NORTH AMERICA ASSOCIATION
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by AEROSPACE NORTH AMERICA ASSOCIATION
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
JAMES A OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGE277 S WASHINGTON ST STE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely t-shirts, and jackets, caps and hats | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | arranging, organizing and promoting trade shows in the field of aviation and aerospace; business marketing consulting services, namely, promoting and developing the display and commerce of products in the aerospace and aviation industry | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |