Drawing for M & P TECHNOLOGIES' SMART BULK LET TOMORROW BE TODAY

USPTO serial 76000208

M & P TECHNOLOGIES' SMART BULK LET TOMORROW BE TODAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M & P TECHNOLOGIES' SMART BULK LET TOMORROW BE TODAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LEON K. OXLEY

LEON K OXLEY FRAZIER & OXLEY, L CP O BOX 2808HUNTINGTON, WV 25727-2808UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water treatment equipment used for the delivery and storage of chemicals, namely, chemical delivery systems comprised of small chemical storage tanks which hold between fifty and two hundred gallons; ultrasonic level sensors for chemical inventory management; programmable controllers for water treatment applications with remote monitoring, adjustment and alarm call-out capabilities, which may be operated via modemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 7, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 20011.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Oct 25, 20011.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Oct 24, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance