USPTO serial 76000589
IP IN-HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IP IN-HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan T. Brown
SUSAN T BROWN PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP1600 TYSONS BLVDMCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Based on Use in commerce - Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network and transmission of data via digital subscriber lines; computer server collocation services, namely, providing collocation services for voice, video and data applications; web casting, namely, content and data distribution of media information such as pictures, sound, text and video | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Editing and translation books, periodical and documents; research and development for new products for others; installation of computer software; computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; commercial art design and consultation; graphic design services, design services for others in the fields of advertising, product packaging, signage, corporate identity, retail environments and commercial environments, trade show booths, point of purchase displays and computer web sites; and notarization services (Based on 44(e)) Computer consultation, namely, custom computer software analysis, development, design, configuration and programming services for others; E-commerce software analysis, development, design, configuration and programming services for others; testing of new computer software products for others; maintenance of computer software; database development services; computer services, namely, application service provider featuring E-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global network; providing assistance in the acquisition of registrations and other intellectual property and technical and jurisdictional searches and research in the field of intellectual property such as patent, trademarks and copyrights; intellectual property consultation and licensing services; legal services; legal services; legal research; and corporate identity system planning, design and consultation for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via in person, telephone, E-mail, world wide web support, and remote access via modem and via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | 1.AA | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |