Drawing for SHARP START

USPTO serial 76000692

SHARP START

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SHARP START?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth W. Wargo

KENNETH W WARGO QUINN LAW FIRM2222 W GRANDVIEW BLVDERIE, PA 16506UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer-controlled intelligent power distribution units (PDUs) and basic PDUs for both alternating current and direct current applications with functions of remote control, sequential delivery of power to outlets and monitoring of power load, voltage, temperature and other variablesABANDONEDMay 17, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 12, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 12, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 23, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 9, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 2, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 11, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance