USPTO serial 76000702
LEARNINGBITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEARNINGBITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Capistrano Beach, CA
Capistrano Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine A. McGowan
KATHERINE A MCGOWAN PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP25TH FL515 S FLOWER STLOS ANGELES, CA 90071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail services, namely providing retail services for custom printed books generated and compiled by a computer software database featuring college-level primary and secondary source documents, case studies and pedagogical material by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2005 |
| 041 | Online education services, namely providing college-level primary and secondary source documents, case studies, and pedagogical material by means of the internet | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |