USPTO serial 76000790
MULTIMEDIA SHREDDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MULTIMEDIA SHREDDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary M. Nath
GARY M NATH NATH & ASSOCIATES1030 FIFTEENTH ST N WSIXTH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | VACUUM CLEANER, VACUUM EQUIPMENT FOR CRUSHED, SUBVERTED AND PRESSED DATA CARRIERS, PAPER, PAPER BOARD AND OTHER PAPER PRODUCTS, AND MICROFILMS; MACHINES, USED FOR CRUSHING, DESTROYING AND PRESSING DATA CARRIERS, FILES, DOCUMENTS AND MICROFILMS AND OTHER SIMILAR MATERIALS; INDUSTRIAL WASTE PRESSES AND BALING PRESSES; AND PARTS FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PAPER AND PLASTIC SHREDDERS FOR OFFICE USE; PAPER PACKAGING MATERIAL AND PLASTIC PACKAGING MATERIAL, NAMELY, ENVELOPES, BAGS, FOILS AND SACKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |