Drawing for PSEUDOSAUR

USPTO serial 76001299

PSEUDOSAUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PSEUDOSAUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD T. WHITE

EDWARD T WHITE HUNTON & WILLIAMSRIVERFRONT PLZ E TWR951 E BYRD STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4074

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive video game programsACTIVE—
028Games and toys, namely, hand held unit for playing video games; toy action figures and accessories therefor; children's multiple activity toys; action skill games; pet toys; card games; jigsaw puzzles; latex squeeze toy figures; plush toys; fabric dolls, soft sculpture infant toys; pop-up toys; mechanical rubber action toys; musical toys; action figure clothing; party favors in the nature of small toys; balloons; and bean bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 13, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 24, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 29, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 23, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance