USPTO serial 76001369
GREENLIGHT.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREENLIGHT.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy L. Robertson
WENDY L ROBERTSON ALSTON & BIRD LLP1201 W PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309-3424UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online ordering services, namely, providing a website used to place orders for the purchase of motor vehicles; promoting the goods and services of others via a global communications network; online ordering services featuring new and used automobiles via a global computer network; online automobile order tracking services for others; automobile trade-in services, namely, providing pricing and market information and automobile exchange opportunities to automobile owners; computer services, namely, providing a database in the fields of motor vehicle purchase and marketing, vehicle registration, tax assessment and reviews of motor vehicles for consumers; information services, namely, providing information related to motor vehicle tax assessment, registration, purchasing, marketing and trade-in market information for consumers; providing online automobile comparisons for consumers; providing an online automobile pricing calculator for consumers | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Delivery of automobiles by truck through local dealer representatives; electronic data storage, namely, saving automobile selections by users to virtual showrooms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Greenlight.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Greenlight.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named GREENLIGHT.COM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |