USPTO serial 76001458
STREETWISE STOCKBROKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STREETWISE STOCKBROKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rochelle D. Alpert
ROCHELLE D ALPERT BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPONE MARKET SPEAR ST TWR ONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |