USPTO serial 76001608
TOUGH, SMART, RELIABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2806077Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 2004
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOUGH, SMART, RELIABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAMELA E. POWERS
PAMELA E POWERS BROWN MCCARROLL, LLP1111 BAGBY, 47TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77000-2254UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Tractor engine parts, namely oil, air and fuel filters for motors and engines, radiator caps, steering leakages, mufflers, axles, gears, bearings, belts, hoses, sway bars, knobs, levers, clutches, fuel pumps, hydraulic pumps, stabilizer arms, weights, drive shafts, rollbars, auxiliary valves, power takeoffs; agricultural implements, namely box blades, tillers, plows, mowers and snowblowers; and attachments, namely front end loaders, canopies, bale spears, and pallet forks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1999 |
| 012 | Motor land vehicles, namely tractors; tractor engines, parts and accessories for land vehicles, namely, engines, transmissions, clutches, brakes, suspension systems for the foregoing vehicles, chassis, structural parts for the foregoing vehicles, alloy vehicle wheels, and canopies for tractors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mahindra & Mahindra Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Mahindra & Mahindra Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Mahindra & Mahindra Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named TOUGH, SMART, RELIABLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |