USPTO serial 76001917
SHARKSAW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHARKSAW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rolling Hills Est., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Marmelstein
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WSTE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | MANUALLY OPERATED HAND-HELD SAWS FOR SAWING WOOD, PLASTIC PIPE, PLASTIC BOARD STOCK, ACRYLIC, DRYWALL, CEMENT WALLBOARD, PARTICLE BOARD, PLASTERBOARD, MELAMINE, FLAT FOAM SHEETS, WALLBOARD, ARTIFICIAL WOOD, AND COMPOSITE BOARD | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |