USPTO serial 76001967
ESYZYGY.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESYZYGY.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M1H 2W1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A Yates Dowell III
A YATES DOWELL III DOWELL & DOWELL PC2111 EISENHOWER AVE STE 406ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | hosting web sites for others on a comupter server for a global computer network; the setting up and operation of e-commerce web-sites for others; providing information in the field of electronic commerce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |